- Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 cancelled annual ESR notification and report filing for financial years ending after 31 December 2022.
- Holding, IP, banking, insurance, fund management, and shipping activities still carry substance expectations under separate frameworks.
- A lot of online guidance still describes the old, now-cancelled annual filing requirement.
- Corporate tax registration and UBO filing are entirely separate obligations, unaffected by this cancellation.
- IP holding structures face stricter ongoing scrutiny than a simple holding company with no IP component.
- Some banks still ask about historical ESR compliance during account review, even though the requirement is cancelled.
Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 cancelled the Economic Substance Regulations reporting requirement for financial years ending after 31 December 2022. Thousands of UAE offshore and free zone companies no longer file the annual ESR notification and report they once dreaded.
This does not mean substance stopped mattering entirely. Specific relevant activities still carry their own substance expectations under other frameworks.
This guide covers what actually got cancelled, which activities still need genuine substance regardless, and why outdated advice about annual ESR filing is still circulating.
Why ESR reporting was such a heavy annual burden
Economic Substance Regulations originally required any UAE entity conducting a defined relevant activity to file an annual notification, and in many cases a detailed report, demonstrating genuine UAE presence. This applied broadly across offshore and free zone structures.
Missing a filing deadline carried real financial penalties, and the reporting itself demanded documentation many smaller offshore holding structures found disproportionate to their actual activity level.
Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 removed this annual burden for financial years ending after 31 December 2022, a genuinely significant compliance relief.
| Detail | What applies |
|---|---|
| Cancellation basis | Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 |
| Effective for | Financial years ending after 31 December 2022 |
| What is cancelled | Annual ESR notification and report filing requirement |
| What still applies | Substance expectations for specific relevant activities under other rules |
| Corporate tax filing | Unaffected; runs as a separate, still-mandatory obligation |
“A lot of advice still online describes ESR as an annual filing every offshore company must complete. That advice is now describing a requirement that stopped applying years ago, and following it wastes real time on a filing nobody is checking anymore.”
Why so much online guidance still describes the old ESR filing requirement
Much of the content explaining UAE Economic Substance Regulations was written before the 2024 cancellation and simply has not been updated. A founder researching offshore compliance today can easily land on genuinely outdated instructions.
This is a real risk specifically because the old requirement was so widely documented. Compliance advice about a cancelled rule is often harder to spot as wrong than advice about something that never existed.
Confirming directly with a current advisor, rather than relying on an article’s publication date alone, is the safest way to avoid acting on stale guidance.
Consider an offshore holding company founder who had spent years diligently filing an annual ESR notification and report, budgeting real time and a compliance consultant’s fee for it each year. Following outdated online guidance, the founder continued this filing well into 2026, unaware the requirement had already been cancelled for financial years ending after 2022.
A routine compliance review with a new advisor flagged that the filing was no longer necessary at all, saving the founder both the annual fee and the internal time the process had consumed for several years past its actual relevance.
Which relevant activities still carry real substance expectations
Cancelling the annual ESR filing did not eliminate substance considerations for every activity type. Banking, insurance, fund management, finance and leasing, headquarters activities, shipping, holding company activities, intellectual property, and distribution and service centre activities still carry substance expectations under separate, activity-specific frameworks.
A holding company or IP-holding structure in particular should not assume the ESR cancellation means substance has stopped mattering entirely for its specific activity type. These categories carry their own continuing scrutiny.
The practical shift is from a uniform annual filing applying broadly, to a narrower, activity-specific set of expectations that only certain structures actually need to address.
Why offshore holding companies specifically need to keep tracking this
Holding company activities remain one of the specifically named categories still carrying substance expectations. An offshore holding structure used purely to hold shares in an operating subsidiary should confirm what genuine substance actually still means for its specific setup.
See our guide on RAK ICC versus JAFZA offshore for a holding structure for how these two common holding jurisdictions compare, since the substance expectation for holding activities applies broadly across offshore structures regardless of which specific jurisdiction is chosen.
Why intellectual property holding structures face the strictest ongoing scrutiny
Intellectual property holding activities carry a historically stricter substance standard than most other relevant activity categories, reflecting international concern about IP structures being used purely to shift profit without genuine underlying activity.
A founder holding valuable IP through an offshore structure purely for asset protection, without any genuine UAE-based development or management activity behind it, faces meaningfully more scrutiny than a simple holding company structure with no IP component.
This distinction is worth understanding clearly before assuming every offshore structure faces identical substance treatment following the general ESR filing cancellation.
Why corporate tax registration remains completely separate from this cancellation
The ESR filing cancellation has no bearing on corporate tax obligations, which apply to all UAE-registered entities under an entirely separate legal framework. A founder should not conflate the two compliance regimes.
See our guide on why free zone corporate tax registration is never optional for how this genuinely separate, still fully mandatory obligation works, since an offshore or free zone company must register for corporate tax regardless of its ESR filing status.
Why beneficial ownership filing was never part of ESR to begin with
Founders sometimes conflate ESR reporting with beneficial ownership disclosure, treating both as part of the same annual compliance package. They have always been entirely separate legal requirements, and the ESR cancellation has no effect on UBO filing obligations.
See our guide on how UAE beneficial ownership filing actually works for this genuinely unrelated, still fully active filing obligation that every UAE company, offshore or otherwise, continues to carry.
Whether a RAK ICC foundation faces the same substance considerations
A RAK ICC foundation, often used for succession and asset protection rather than pure holding purposes, sits under a somewhat different analysis than a standard holding company, though the underlying relevant activity categories still apply where genuinely triggered.
See our guide on what actually distinguishes a RAK ICC foundation from a standard offshore company for how this structure’s specific purpose affects which substance considerations, if any, genuinely apply to it.
Whether banks still ask about ESR compliance during account review
Some banks built ESR compliance checks into their standard onboarding and periodic review processes during the years the requirement was actively enforced. A founder should not be surprised if a bank’s compliance team still asks about historical ESR filing status during a review, even though the requirement itself has been cancelled going forward.
See our guide on the standard corporate account documentation UAE banks request for the broader documentation a bank commonly requests, since some banks’ internal processes take time to fully catch up with a regulatory cancellation like this one.
Having a clear, confident explanation ready, referencing Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 directly, resolves this kind of question quickly rather than leaving a founder scrambling to explain an outdated filing gap that was never actually required.
Why a company should still document this change in its own compliance file
A company that simply stops filing ESR notifications without any internal record of why risks confusion later, particularly if staff or advisors change and nobody remembers the cancellation occurred. A brief internal note referencing the relevant Cabinet Decision avoids this confusion.
See our guide on building a proper UAE compliance record as a business grows for how a change like this should be documented as part of an ongoing compliance record, rather than simply assumed and forgotten once the immediate relief registers.
This documentation habit matters most for companies using multiple advisors over time, where institutional memory of why a filing stopped can otherwise be lost entirely within a year or two.
Why shipping and fund management structures still face close scrutiny
Shipping activities and fund management, both named as relevant activities under the original ESR framework, continue carrying genuine substance expectations despite the annual filing cancellation. These sectors involve exactly the kind of cross-border profit allocation international substance rules were designed to address.
A UAE-based shipping or fund management structure should not extrapolate from the general ESR cancellation news to assume its own sector-specific scrutiny has disappeared. These categories remain a clear exception to the broader relief.
A founder in either sector should specifically confirm current expectations with a specialist advisor rather than relying on general ESR cancellation coverage that rarely details these sector-specific carve-outs clearly.
Why old ESR filings still deserve careful retention despite the cancellation
A company should not discard historical ESR notifications and reports simply because the requirement itself has been cancelled going forward. These records remain relevant evidence of past compliance, potentially useful during any future regulatory or banking review touching earlier periods.
Standard UAE record retention practice generally suggests keeping this kind of compliance documentation for several years past the period it covers, consistent with broader corporate record-keeping norms rather than treating cancelled requirements as reason for immediate disposal.
A founder unsure how long to retain this specific documentation should default to the same retention period applied to other corporate compliance records, rather than assuming a cancelled requirement means its historical paperwork no longer matters at all.
Why a founder incorporating a new offshore entity today should still ask about this upfront
A founder setting up a new offshore holding structure today should still raise substance considerations during the initial planning conversation, rather than assuming the topic is now entirely irrelevant given the general filing cancellation.
Confirming upfront whether the planned activity falls into one of the still-scrutinized relevant activity categories shapes the structure itself, potentially affecting decisions like where management and control genuinely sit.
This upfront conversation costs little time compared with restructuring later if a business’s activity turns out to fall squarely into a category the general cancellation never actually touched.
Why a company’s outsourced accountant also needs to know about this change
n
A business using an external accountant or corporate service provider for its annual filings should specifically confirm that provider has updated its own process to reflect the ESR cancellation. Some providers may still be billing for or completing a filing that is no longer required.
n
A quick conversation confirming this explicitly, rather than assuming the provider has already adjusted, avoids paying for unnecessary work going forward.
Common mistakes when approaching UAE Economic Substance Regulations in 2026
- Continuing to file an annual ESR notification and report that Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 already cancelled.
- Assuming the cancellation means substance has stopped mattering entirely for holding or IP activities.
- Conflating ESR cancellation with corporate tax or beneficial ownership filing obligations, which remain fully active.
- Not documenting internally why ESR filing stopped, risking confusion when advisors or staff change later.
When professional help is worth it
A straightforward offshore holding structure with no IP, banking, or fund management activity can often confirm its own reduced compliance position directly by reviewing Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024. Where guidance is worth the cost is any structure involving IP holding, banking, insurance, or fund management activity, since these categories still carry genuine, activity-specific substance expectations worth confirming properly.
an e.zone advisor familiar with substance and ESR rules can confirm exactly which substance obligations still apply to your specific offshore structure. See e.zone’s earlier guide on why Economic Substance Regulation matters for a business for the historical context this 2024 cancellation actually changed.
Frequently asked questions
Do offshore companies still need to file an annual ESR report?
No. Cabinet Decision No. 98 of 2024 cancelled this requirement for financial years ending after 31 December 2022.
Does this mean substance no longer matters at all?
No. Holding, IP, banking, insurance, fund management, shipping, and distribution activities still carry substance expectations under other frameworks.
Does the ESR cancellation affect corporate tax registration?
No, corporate tax registration is an entirely separate, still fully mandatory obligation for every UAE-registered entity.
Why does so much online advice still describe the old ESR filing requirement?
Much of that content was written before the 2024 cancellation and has not been updated, so it describes a requirement that no longer applies.
Does UBO filing still apply after this cancellation?
Yes, beneficial ownership disclosure was always a separate legal requirement from ESR and is unaffected by this change.
Talk to a setup advisor
Free 20-minute call to confirm the right structure for your business.
Related Reading
Offshore Company Setup EU Beneficial Ownership Disclosure and UAE Offshore Companies: The Dual-Compliance Reality
Offshore Company Setup UAE Offshore Company Banking in 2026: JAFZA vs RAK ICC vs Ajman Compared
Offshore Company Setup RAK ICC Offshore Companies Can Now Hold Dubai Real Estate: What Changed
Offshore Company Setup